Conditional Reasoning with Negations: Matching Bias and Implicit Versus Explicit Affirmation or Denial
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Implicit versus explicit comparatives
It is natural to assume that the explicit comparative – John is taller than Mary – can be true in cases the implicit comparative – John is tall compared to Mary – is not. This is sometimes seen as a threat to comparison-class based analyses of the comparative. In this paper it is claimed that the distinction between explicit and implicit comparatives corresponds to the difference between (stric...
متن کاملExplicit, Neutral, or Implicit
Social groups have different rules and preferences for what they consider acceptable behavior and a social behavior that is favorable in a certain cultural context may be unacceptable in another. In this study, we evaluate the effects of robot communication style on how participants from two distinct cultures (Indian and American) perceive them; the robots use or violate cultural norms. We recr...
متن کاملMeasuring the Effectiveness of Explicit and Implicit Instruction through Explicit and Implicit Measures
Many studies have examined the effect of different approaches to teaching grammar including explicit and implicit instruction. However, research in this area is limited in a number of respects. One such limitation pertains to the issue of construct validity of the measures, i.e. the knowledge developed through implicit instruction has been measured through instruments which favor th...
متن کاملExplicit Versus Implicit Income Insurance
By supplementing income explicitly through payments or implicitly through taxes collected, income-based taxes and transfers make disposable income less variable. Because disposable income determines consumption, policies that smooth disposable income also create welfare improving consumption insurance. With data from the Panel Study of Income Dynamics we find that annual consumption variation i...
متن کاملContextual Negations and Reasoning with Contradictions
This paper introduces the logical basis for mod elling the phenomenon of reasoning in the pres ence of contradiction, by identifying this prob lem with the notion of change of context. We give here the basic definitions of a new seman tics, which works by interpreting one logic into a family of logics via translations, which we call semantics of translations. As a particular ap plication w...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Psychologica Belgica
سال: 1999
ISSN: 2054-670X,0033-2879
DOI: 10.5334/pb.952